Indirect discrimination can often go unnoticed, but its impact can be just as damaging as overt, intentional bias.
Unlike direct discrimination, which is usually easier to identify, indirect discrimination tends to arise from rules, policies, or practices that seem neutral but end up hurting certain groups of people.
Whether you’re an employee questioning a company policy or an HR professional aiming to foster a fairer workplace, understanding what indirect discrimination looks like is an important first step.
In this guide, our legal experts explain what indirect discrimination means under UK law, provide real-world examples, and outline what you can do if you believe you’ve been affected.
Indirect discrimination happens when a policy, practice, or rule applies to everyone in the same way, but puts people from a particular protected group at a disadvantage.
It isn’t always intentional. In fact, many employers may not realise their policies are causing harm. But under the Equality Act 2010, indirect discrimination is unlawful if it cannot be justified as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
To legally count as indirect discrimination, four conditions must be met:
Protected characteristics include age, sex, race, religion or belief, disability, sexual orientation, gender reassignment, marriage or civil partnership, and pregnancy or maternity.
Understanding how indirect discrimination works in practice can help you spot it more easily. Below are a few common workplace scenarios where seemingly neutral policies may disadvantage certain groups.
An employer introduces a strict dress code that bans all head coverings. While intended to appear professional, this rule could indirectly discriminate against individuals who wear head coverings for religious reasons, such as Muslim women or Sikh men.
A company insists that all roles must be done full-time in the office. This blanket rule may disadvantage parents who require flexibility due to childcare responsibilities, potentially amounting to indirect sex discrimination with mothers being disproportionately affected.
In fact, a 2025 report found women are almost twice as likely as men to report feeling discriminated against because of their gender. On average, nearly one in seven (15%) women in the UK say they've experienced sexism in their working lives, compared to one in 12 (8.5%) men. With the growing practice of men taking paternity leave and shared maternity leave there will undoubtedly be a number of men who feel discriminated in the workplace.
Requiring employees to attend work events outside of office hours, travel overseas or socialise with clients may all disadvantage some employees. For example, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. with disabilities or caring responsibilities may find it harder to adapt quickly, meaning they’re disproportionately impacted by the policy.
Requiring a certain number of years of continuous service for promotion could disadvantage women who have taken maternity leave, or people with long-term health conditions, even if their time away from work was legally protected.
|
Feature |
Direct Discrimination |
Indirect Discrimination |
|
Definition |
Treating someone less favourably because of a protected characteristic |
Applying a rule or policy that appears neutral but disadvantages a group |
|
Intentional? |
Often intentional or clearly targeted |
Usually unintentional or indirect in effect |
|
Focus |
Individual treatment |
Broad policies, practices, or rules |
|
Example |
Refusing to hire someone because of their religion |
Having a uniform policy that prohibits religious attire |
|
Legality under UK Law |
Unlawful in almost all cases |
Unlawful unless the employer can justify the policy |
|
Can It Be Justified? |
Rarely justified |
Can be legal if it’s a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim |
Indirect discrimination is covered under the Equality Act 2010, which protects individuals from being disadvantaged at work due to certain characteristics.
The law recognises nine protected characteristics:
If a workplace policy, rule or requirement disproportionately disadvantages a group based on one of these characteristics and the employer cannot justify it, it may be considered unlawful.
If not, employees affected may have grounds to bring a claim.
Importantly, you do not need to prove intent – only that the rule or policy causes a disadvantage and is not justifiable. This makes it a powerful legal protection for employees who may otherwise struggle to raise concerns about workplace inequality.
If successful, a claim may result in:
If you believe a workplace policy or practice has put you or others who share a protected characteristic at a disadvantage, you have the right to challenge it under the Equality Act 2010.
You’re not alone in your battle either. Unfortunately, a 2025 study found over two fifths (45%) of UK adults say they have experienced some form of workplace discrimination – either in the workplace (38%) or when applying for new jobs (39%) or both.
Many cases of indirect discrimination are resolved without going to court. However, taking early legal advice helps you understand your options and take the best course of action for your situation.
For more information on how we operate and what to expect, you can explore our Costs and Services guide to make a decision that’s right for you.
At Cavendish, we understand that indirect discrimination can be subtle, frustrating, and difficult to challenge without support.
Our award-winning team has successfully represented clients in a wide range of discrimination claims – from unfair promotion policies to rigid workplace rules that disadvantage parents, carers, or religious groups.
If you believe a workplace policy has unfairly affected you, we can:
You don’t have to face this alone. With a 100% success rate in contentious cases, Cavendish Employment Law provides clear, expert guidance from day one.
Call us today on 0207 965 7203 or contact us online for confidential advice.
Our experts can help
Contact UsContact us for immediate confidential advice. Out of Hours and Weekend help available
It would not be an exaggeration to say that I was extremely pessimistic about being able to get a decent redundancy settlement. I was feeling really low and depressed. That all changed when Caroline Walker agreed to act for me.She secured an excellent settlement for me, without me having to face the expense and stress of going to court...
- Martine Roberts"I cannot recommend you highly enough. A law firm that really delivers all it promises. I never thought I would say that I found the costs reasonable, but I did, and I will never get over how much you secured for me in a totally unexpected settlement. It has set me up for the next chapter in my life. Thank you, thank you."
- J. Brown"I would like to thank you for your exceptional service. You and your firm Cavendish Employment Law have been brilliant in your responsiveness and legal advice. We have had numerous time sensitive and complex issues. You always delivered for our company in spite of very challenging timelines. I highly recommend you and your firm."
- John McVeighIt would not be an exaggeration to say that I was extremely pessimistic about being able to get a decent redundancy settlement. I was feeling really low and depressed. That all changed when Caroline Walker agreed to act for me.She secured an excellent settlement for me, without me having to face the expense and stress of going to court...
- Martine Roberts"I cannot recommend Caroline more highly. Any client of hers is really fortunate to have her on their side. She is a credit to her profession and I am most grateful to her."
- Jake Brown